Case Summary

On March 18, 2022 Animal Protection Services of Saskatchewan responded to a complaint about Tokaryk’s cattle.  They visited the property several times in March of 2022 and executed a search warrant on April 6, 2022.  During the search of Tokaryk’s properties, 150 cattle were found deceased.  309 cattle were seized and sold to satisfy the security interest held in the cattle.  Mr. Tokaryk received no money from the seizure and sale of the cattle. The expert evidence from the veterinarian established that the cattle died from starvation, over a lengthy period of time.  Mr. Tokaryk indicated that some of the cattle had Johne’s disease, which is an incurable bacterial infection of the intestine.  In pleading guilty, Mr. Tokaryk acknowledged that he caused the cattle pain and suffering by allowing them to starve to death without taking steps to euthanize them.  Mr. Tokaryk is now 82 years old.  As a result of this offence, his means of making a living was lost to him.  He lost the cattle herd and all of the land that he owned.  He has moved to the city and has limited physical mobility.

Summary of Prohibition Order

30 day conditional discharge with 5 year prohibition on having the custody, care or control of livestock pursuant to s. 447.1 of the Criminal Code.

Conviction

CCC

Prohibition Period

May 3, 2024 - May 3, 2029

-

Case Summary

A dog was found with a significant eye injury that had not been seen by a veterinarian. Owner was given a Corrective Action Order (CAO) but failed to follow through with care. Dog was taken into protective custody and provided with veterinary care. Owner plead guilty to Section 23(1)(a) APA 2018, failure to comply with CAO. Other APA charges were stayed. Received $100 fine and a five year prohibition order.

Summary of Prohibition Order

The said BEVERLY YUZICAPPI is prohibited from owning, having custody, control, or residing  in  the  same  premises  with  more  than  two  dogs  for  a  period  of

5 years    commencing on the date of this order.

CONDITIONS:

Pursuant to section 23(5) of The Animal Protection Act, 2018, BEYERL Y YUZICAPPI shall:

1. Not own, have custody, control or reside in the same premises as more than two
2. Within 90 days from the time of this order disperse any additional dogs she owns or has custody and control of.
3. Provide proof of annual veterinary evaluations and perform any treatment required for dogs she owns or has custody and control of.
4. Permit and facilitate access to her premises or other properties where animals(s) may be present between the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM by Officers of Animal Protection Services of Saskatchewan or any peace officer.
5. Notify the Animal Protection Service of Saskatchewan of your current address and any changes of address during the period of this order.

Should BEVERLY YUZICAPPI be found in possession of animals contrary to this Order, all animals will be forfeited and removed from her possession forthwith and will be forfeited to Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Saskatchewan.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

October 14, 2021 - October 14, 2025

Case Summary

A total of 5 dogs,  18 cats, one rabbit, one California kingsnake, and one bearded dragon were taken into protective custody after the execution of a search warrant.  All animals lacked adequate care and were in distress as defined in The Animal Protection Act, 2018.  A number of animals required to be euthanized due to the poor prognosis for recovery. Both owners were found guilty on three counts each under The Animal Protection Act, 2018.  Each received a $300 fine and ordered to pay $7,726.91 restitution for the care of the animals. Each was also given a prohibition order.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Each is prohibited from owning animals for 15 years with the exception of 2 male dogs. Allow for inspections without warrant, provide address, and forfeiture of animals if in breach.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

January 21, 2021 - January 21, 2036

Case Summary

Owner had been physically abusing a brown pitbull mix on several occasions between April and May 2022. Dog was seized and provided veterinary care. Dog was ultimately surrender by Mcauley.  Mcauley was charged under Section 445.1(1)(a) of the Criminal Code of Canada for causing unnecessary pain, suffering, or injury to an animal. He was fined $500 and received a two year prohibition.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Two year prohibition from owning, having custody or control of an animal, residing in the same residence of an animal

Conviction

CCC

Prohibition Period

February 1, 2023 - February 1, 2025

-

Case Summary

137 cattle and 2 hogs were seen on APOs initial attendance. APOs also found 30 deceased cattle carcasses throughout the main pasture and corrals. Necropsy results from the cattle’s remains indicated that they had starved to death. The Owner was issued a Corrective Action Order for the remaining cattle including following the requirements in the Beef Code of Practice, especially pertaining to food, water, shelter, bedding and calving management. Hnatuk, Lynsay and Dennis, Barbara Jean were also charged under Section 4 of The Animal Protection Act, 2018 but those charges were later stayed. Bradley Neil Dennis plead guilty to Section 4 of The Animal Protection Act, 2018 and was fined $2500 and given a Prohibition Order.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Bradley Neil DENNIS be prohibited from owning, having custody, control, or residing on the same premises, as all livestock for FIVE YEARS. Bradley Neil DENNIS will have 30 DAYS from the date of this order to disperse of the bovines and pigs he owns or has custody of and must provide bills of sale or proof of dispersal. To ensure compliance with this order Bradley Neil DENNIS shall permit and facilitate access to his premises during daylight hours by Officers of Animal Protection Services of Saskatchewan or any peace officer (as defined in the Criminal Code). During the term of this order Bradley Neil DENNIS shall at all times keep Animal Protection Services of Saskatchewan apprised of his address and any land he owns, rents, or leases and shall at all times keep Animal Protection Services of Saskatchewan apprised of his address change within 15 days of any such change. During the term of this order, should Bradley Neil DENNIS be found in possession of livestock contrary to this Order, the livestock will be forfeited to His Majesty the King in Right of Saskatchewan. 5 YEARS, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 447.1(1) OF THE CRIMINAL CODE.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

June 14, 2024 - June 14, 2029

Case Summary

A search warrant was executed on the property and over two days a total of 97 dogs and two cats were either surrendered or seized and taken into protective custody. Multiple dogs were observed with dirty, wet, and matted hair coats. Multiple dogs observed with lameness concerns. Multiple dogs were very skittish/feral in demeanor. Multiple dogs observed shivering while outdoors and in the barn without adequate shelter or protection from injurious cold. The ammonia levels inside the residence were evident when the door was opened and proper ventilation was not possible with the sheer number of animals. The veterinarian attending on the file provided the following statement in their report: Trying to manage and adequately care for as many animals as Ms. Matz was, is simply not possible unless there are proper facilities. Adequate food, water, shelter, enrichment, socialization, etc., are all the things that need to be consistently provided to an animal. The animals in Ms. Matz’s care were, in fact, not cared for. The living condition of both the animals as well as their owner is unacceptable. The living condition of these animals is deplorable and creates an animal welfare issue. The fact that sixty-five percent of these animals showed evidence of pellets on their x-rays, is a huge concern. Ms. Matz stated that she had shot firearms in the air, but not directly at the animals. In my opinion, I do not believe that the pellets could have entered the dog’s skin/tissue unless directly shot at. However, I have never dealt with a situation such as this before. I do believe, however, that the animals would have likely been terrified and in pain when they were hit with the pellets, as they did enter through their skin”.

Charges against Jonas MATZ were stayed. Ursula MATZ plead guilty to a charge under Section 4 of The Animal Protection Act, 2018 and was fined $2500 and received a Prohibition Order for life.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Ursula MATZ is prohibited from owning, having custody or control of or residing on the same premises of any animal with the exception of no more than two (2) spayed/neutered cat(s) or dog(s) for a total of LIFE. Ursula MATZ is required to have the animals examined by a licensed veterinarian annually, and no later than one (1) year apart. Ursula MATZ is to follow all veterinary requirements regarding the animals. A veterinary report is to be provided to Animal Protection Services of Saskatchewan. The cost(s) of the veterinary examination(s) and report are to be the responsibility of Ursula MATZ. Ursula MATZ will have 30 days from the time of this order to disperse of additional animals she owns or has custody or control of and must provide bills of sale or proof of dispersal. To ensure compliance with this order, Ursula MATZ shall permit and facilitate access to her premises during daylight hours by officers of Animal Protection Services of Saskatchewan, or any peace officer (as defined in the criminal code). During the term of this order, Ursula MATZ shall at all times keep Animal Protection Services of Saskatchewan apprised of her address and any land she owns, rents, or leases and shall at all times keep Animal Protection Services of Saskatchewan apprised of her address change within 15 days of any such change. During the term of this order, should Ursula MATZ be found in possession of any animals contrary to this order, the animal(s) will be forfeited and removed from her possession forthwith and will be forfeited to His Majesty The King in Right of Saskatchewan.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

February 5, 2024 -

Case Summary

APSS received a complaint about a large number of cats living in unsanitary conditions.  APOs had a previous history with the owner but were unable to obtain a search warrant to gain entry at that time.  At this attendance the owner again denied entry into the home but did bring one cat to the door and surrendered it to APOs. This cat had a poor prognosis and was euthanized.  The owner was provided education on sanitary environments for cats including litter boxes and access to adequate food and water.  APOs were able to obtain a search warrant and returned to the residence.  Due to the conditions inside the home APOs had to wear full PPE including masks and goggles.  Many areas of the residence had ammonia readings of 25 PPM or greater. Allegedly 20-30 cats had been rehomed to a “rescue” after the last attendance by APOs but conditions in the home would indicate that cats were present recently.  A Corrective Action Order was issued that any cats remaining in the residence if any are to be immediately removed and provided a sanitary environment. No animals are to be in the residence until sanitary conditions are satisfactory to APSS.  APOs followed up on the Corrective Action Order and found no cats in the residence. The conditions had improved and the owner was put in contact with human services to address some of his issues. The owner was charged under s. 4 of The Animal Protection Act, 2018. He was found guilty and sentenced to a fine of $600 and prohibited from owning felines for life with the exception of three felines.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Prohibited from owning, having custody, control, or residing in the same premises as felines for LIFE except no more than three felines. Shall permit access to his premises and residence by APSS or Peace Officer. Shall at all times keep APSS apprised of his address of residency. If found in possession or control of felines contrary to this order or in the event should the premises in the absolute discretion of an APO be deemed to be unsuitable for the felines to live, the felines will be forfeited and removed from the possession forthwith and will be forfeited.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

March 10, 2022 -

Case Summary

APSS received a concern alleging that the owner hadn’t been feeding his cattle all winter. That there was no hay or straw available to the cattle and that there were dead cattle on the property. Animal Protection Officers attended and found two deceased cattle on the property and 12 cattle with no supplemental feed available and only snow melt for water.  When no contact was received from the owner APOs obtained a search warrant for the property. 35 cattle were seen that were under condition. Some pelleted ration was available and well water was available to the cattle. Veterinary requirements were included with the Corrective Action Order to improve the feeding practices, ensure free choice water, and improve care consistent with the NFACC for the Care and Handling of Beef Cattle was issued to the owner.  Several femur samples were removed from the deceased animals on property and sent for testing.  The owner complied with most of the requirements under the Corrective Action Order upon follow up. The owner euthanized a number of animals that had not responded to veterinary treatment and brought in additional feed for the remaining animals. Bone marrow fat testing from the seized femurs indicated that the animals had been in a negative energy balance for a significant period of time. Owner was charged under s. 4 of The Animal Protection Act, 2018.  The owner plead guilty to the offence and was sentenced to a fine of $1430 and a victim surcharge of $570.  No Prohibition Order was granted by the court.

Summary of Prohibition Order

None granted

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

Case Summary

Animal Protection Officers attended a location regarding unsanitary conditions for a large number of dogs in a residence. APOs found a large number of dogs living in poor, unsanitary conditions. Officers provided education and recommendations  that a number of dogs  MUST be vet assessed and treated within 2 weeks. Provide report to APSS. MUST provide adequate and sanitary living conditions. Improvement must be made to spacing, air quality and sanitation/cleanliness of living environment. Provide insulated and heated shelter to dogs outside with bedding.  Reduce population to a manageable number and spay/neuter. Follow kennel Code of Practice. Officers followed up at a later date and found no significant improvements to the conditions and issued a Corrective Action Order to follow all veterinary recommendations, improve air quality and living conditions for all animals. APOs followed up again with a search warrant with a registered veterinarian were no significant improvement to the conditions had occurred. One dog required euthanasia, 13 dogs were surrendered by the owners and 32 dogs were seized and taken into protective custody. Owners were charged under s. 4 and s. 23(1)(a) of The Animal Protection Act, 2018. Both owners were found guilty and sentenced to a fine of $2000 each.

https://www.canlii.org/en/sk/skpc/doc/2023/2023skpc2/2023skpc2.html?resultIndex=4

Summary of Prohibition Order

Morgan Desjarlais and Gary Gillingwater are prohibited from owning, having custody, control, of any animal with the exception of 2 dogs (indoor or outdoor) commencing on the date of this order for a period of five years. pursuant to Section 23(2) of The Animal Protection Act, 2018. 

Pursuant to section 23(2) of The Animal Protection Act, 2018, shall:

1. Within 90 days of the date of this order, Morgan Desjarlais/Gary Gillingwater shall dispose of any additional animals or dogs he currently owns or have in his care.
2. Allow Animal Protection officers on one occasion and without warrant access during daylight hours to any premise he own or control following the 90 day period noted above to ensure compliance with this order
3. Provide Animal Protection officers with his current address and any new or updated address they may obtain during the course of this order.

Should Morgan Desjarlais/Gary Gillingwater be found in possession of animals contrary to this Order, the animal(s) will be forfeited and removed from his possession forthwith and will be forfeited to His Majesty the King in Right of Saskatchewan.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

February 6, 2023 - February 6, 2028

-

Case Summary

Animal Protection Officers responded to a concern reported by RCMP for cattle not being provided adequate feed, water, and care. Officers discovered 60 cattle in poor condition with very little feed available. Owner was issued a Corrective Action Order to feed concentrates and bring more forage in for the cattle. As well to provide bedding and windbreaks for the cattle. When conditions had not improved 41 cattle were taken into protective custody and delivered to a caretaker. Mr. Barber was charged under s. 4 & 23(1)(a) of the Animal Protection Act and s. 445.1(1)(a) and 446(1)(b) of the Criminal Code of Canada. Mr. Barber plead guilty to the charges under the APA and was sentenced to a fine of $500 and prohibited from owning cattle for 5 years as of December 7, 2022.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Prohibited from owning or having custody or control of any livestock for 5 yrs from Dec. 7th, 2022. 30 days to disperse of any animals; must provide APSS with current address. Must allow for inspections of property owned or leased by an APO or peace officer without a warrant to ensure compliance. If found in possession livestock will be forfeited and removed forthwith.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

December 7, 2022 - December 7, 2027

Case Summary

Animal Protection Officers attended a concern at a rural property where there was a concern for inadequate feed, water, and care for horses, cattle, sheep, goats and poultry.  Multiple attendances occurred were officers provided education regarding the care of animals including provided NFACC Codes of Practice for all species on the property. Corrective Action Orders were issued with specific instructions for providing care including veterinary care for many of the animals on property. Multiple search warrants occurred were a number of animals required euthanasia and ultimately 56 cattle, 44 horse, 219 sheep, 20 cats, and 364 fowl were taken into protective custody. During the execution of the warrant Mr. Maximnuk assaulted one of the officers and attempted to obstruct the removal of the animals.  He was charged under s. 4 of The Animal Protection Act, 2018 and s. 129(a), s. 270(2), s. 445.1(a), and s. 446 of the Criminal Code of Canada.  He was found guilty under s. 4 of the APA and sentenced to a fine of $4200 and $1800 victim surcharge. He was found guilty under s. 270(2) of the CCC and was sentenced to a 6 month conditional sentence. He was found guilty under s. 445.1(a) and sentenced to a fine of a $1000 and $300 victim surcharge. He was also issued a Prohibition Order restricting animal ownership for his lifetime. Mr. Maximnuk was found not guilty under s. 129(a) and s. 446 of the CCC.

Summary of Prohibition Order

WILLIAM MAXIMNUK on or about the 2nd day of June, 2020 at or near RM OF BUCHANAN, Saskatchewan did

ASSAULT ON DON FERGUSON, A PUBLIC OFFICER FOR ANIMAL PROTECTION SERVICES ENGAGED IN THE EXECUTION OF HIS DUTY CONTRARY TO SECTION 270(2) OF THE CRIMINAL CODE.

AND WHEREAS the Court has ordered that the offender be imprisoned for a term of: 6 Months, Conditional Sentence Length Order# 94931009

AND WHEREAS the Court has ordered that the offender be imprisoned for a TOTAL term of: 6 Months

AND WHEREAS the Court is satisfied that service of the sentence of imprisonment in the community would not endanger the safety of the community, the Court FURTHER ORDERS that the offender serve this sentence of imprisonment in the community, subject to his or her compliance with the following conditions, namely that the offender:

1. Keep the peace and be of good
2. Appear before the court when required to do so by the
3. Report to the Supervisor or his delegate within two working days of today’s date and after that when required and in the manner directed by the Supervisor or his/her Designate
4. Remain within the Jurisdiction of the court (Saskatchewan) unless written permission to go outside that Jurisdiction is obtained from the Court or Supervisor.
5. Notify the Supervisor in advance of any change in the Offender’s name or address and promptly notify the Supervisor of any change of the Offender’s employment or occupation

WILLIAM MAXIMNUK is prohibited from owning, being a person responsible for or having the custody or control of cattle, horses, fowl, sheep, and cats commencing on the date of this order and for the remainder of his life, pursuant to the provisions of Section 23 of The Animal Protection Act, 2018 except for the following types and corresponding numbers of animals:

60 (Sixty) Cattle inclusive of any offspring;

22 (Twenty-Two) Horses inclusive of any offspring; and 30 (Thirty) Chickens inclusive of any offspring; (hereinafter referred to as the “Permitted Animals”)

Pursuant to Section 23(5) of The Animal Protection Act, 2018, during the term of this prohibition William Maxinmuk shall not own, lease, use, control, reside on or occupy the same property as cattle, horses, fowl, sheep, and cats except the Permitted Animals.

Pursuant to Section 23(5) of the The Animal Protection Act, 2018, during the term of this prohibition William Maximnuk shall provide Animal Protection Services of Sasktachewan with a current address of residence including a proper land location, by March 27^th, 2023 and he shall advise Animal Protection Services of Saskatchewan, in writing, of any change of residence within fifteen (15) days of any such change.

Pursuant to Section 23(5) of the The Animal Protection Act, 2018, during the term of this prohibition William Maximnuk shall provide Animal Protection Services of Saskatchewan with a complete listing of all real property that he owns, leases, uses, controls or occupies where the Permitted Animals may be kept by him including a proper land location, by March 27^th, 2023 and he shall advise Animal Protection Services of Saskatchewan, in writing, of any change to the real property he owns, leases, uses, controls or occupies within fifteen (I 5) days of any such change.

Pursuant to Section 23(5) of the The Animal Protection Act, 2018, during the term of this prohibition William Maximnuk shall allow for inspection by an Animal Protection Officers or Peace Officers (as defined in the Criminal Code) of real property owned, leased, used, controlled, resided on or occupied by him, without warrant, to ensure compliance with this order.

Pursuant to Section 23(5) of the The Animal Protection Act, 2018, should William Maximnuk at any time be found in possession of cattle, horses, fowl, sheep or cats in a number or kind greater than the Permitted Animals, such additional animals will be forfeited and removed from his possession forthwith and will be forfeited to his Majesty the King, the Right of Saskatchewan.

Conviction

APA, CCC

Prohibition Period

March 20, 2023 -

Case Summary

Animal Protection Officers attended a property with a concern for unsanitary conditions for dogs and cats inside the residence. Officers found conditions to be unsanitary and causing animals to be in distress. Officers issued a corrective action order to rectify conditions which ultimately was not complied with.  A search warrant was executed and two dogs and fifteen cats were found to be living in unsanitary conditions. All animals were taken into protective custody after the ammonia levels were determined to be too high and and conditions inside the residence were causing the animals to also be in distress.  An additional 34 deceased cats were located in freezers within the home. Both residents in the home were charged under s. 4 of The Animal Protection Act, 2018 and s. 445.1(1)(a) & 446(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada.  Both plead guilt to the Animal Protection Act charges and were fined $1000 and prohibited from owning, having custody, control, or residing in the same premises as any animal for a period of FIVE years.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Robyn St. Laurent is prohibited from owning. having custody, control, or residing in the same premises as any animal for a period of FIVE years. To ensure compliance with this -Order Robyn St. Laurent shall permit and facilitate access to her premises during daylight hours by Officer of Animal Protection Services of Saskatchewan or any peace officer (as defined by the Criminal Code of Canada). During the term of this Order Robyn St. Laurent shall at all times keep Animal Protection Services of Saskatchewan apprised of her address of residency. During the term of this Order should Robyn St. Laurent be found in possession or control an any animal(s) contrary to this Order, the animal(s) will be forfeited to Animal Protection Services of Saskatchewan and/or Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Saskatchewan.

Dylan Gellert is prohibited from owning. having custody, control, or residing in the same premises as any animal for a period of FIVE years. To ensure compliance with this -Order Robyn St. Laurent shall permit and facilitate access to her premises during daylight hours by Officer of Animal Protection Services of Saskatchewan or any peace officer (as defined by the Criminal Code of Canada). During the term of this Order Robyn St. Laurent shall at all times keep Animal Protection Services of Saskatchewan apprised of her address of residency. During the term of this Order should Robyn St. Laurent be found in possession or control an any animal(s) contrary to this Order, the animal(s) will be forfeited to Animal Protection Services of Saskatchewan and/or Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Saskatchewan.

Conviction

APA, CCC

Prohibition Period

March 21, 2022 - March 21, 2027

-

Case Summary

Animal Protection Officers (APO) attended a location where animals were being kept contrary to an order of court. APOs attended and found WEBSTER-DINNEY in possession of 5 dogs and 4 cats. Owner was prohibited from having any animals except one dog “Bentley” that had been identified as a service animal in the order. All animals other than “Bentley” were seized and removed from the property.

RCMP laid Criminal Code charges under section 447.1(1).  Owner was convicted and the Order of Prohibition remains in effect. 3 months Suspended Sentence Probation Order, victim surcharge was waived. Restitution Order of $9085.77

Summary of Prohibition Order

DONNA LEE WEBSTER-DINNEY is prohibited from owning, having the custody or control of or residing in the same premises as an animal for a period of 5 years. Donna Lee Webster-Dinney will have 30 days from the time of this order to disperse the animal she owns or has custody or control of. To ensure compliance with this order Donna Lee Webster-Dinney shall permit and facilitate access to her premises during daylight hours by officers of Animal Protection Services of Saskatchewan or any peace officer (as defined by the Criminal Code of Canada). During the term of this order Donna Lee Webster­Dinney shall at all times keep Animal Protection Services of Saskatchewan apprised of her address of residency. During the term of this order should Donna Lee Webster-Dinney be found in possession or control of any animal(s) contrary to this Order, the animal(s) will be forfeited to Animal Protection Services of Saskatchewan and/or Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Saskatchewan, except one dog named Bentley, used as a service dog. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 447.1(1) of the Criminal Code.

Conviction

Criminal Code

Prohibition Period

August 25, 2020 - August 25, 2025

Case Summary

That between March 1, 2021 and July 16, 2021 Animal Protection Services made 6 visits and executed 1 search warrant on property rented by EASHAPPIE. On this property were cattle, horses, goats and a llama found to be in distress contrary to section 4 of the Animal Protection Act 2018. The live cattle on property were found to be in emaciated to thin body condition, horses were in thin and potbellied condition to adequate body condition, the llama had an overgrown, matted haircoat and the goats had severely overgrown hooves. 2 deceased equine carcasses and 11 deceased bovine carcasses were found throughout the property and varied in decomposition. All of the animals on the property had no access to adequate food or water to maintain them in a state of good health or shelter and bedding to protect from injurious cold. Several of the animals were in need of veterinary care and/or medical attention. On one occasion 2 deceased bovine carcasses, 1 deceased equine carcass, 1 equine and 4 bovine long bones were seized for evidence and submitted for necropsy. The necropsy results in the cattle were reported to have twine impaction in their rumen, severe copper deficiency and no fat storage found within the animal(s). The horse was reported to be in emaciated body condition with serious atrophy of fat and heavy gastrointestinal parasitism which is indicative of an overload of parasites within the horse(s). Normal percentage of bone marrow fat content in cattle is between 70% to 80% and less than 20% marrow fat content is considered to be indicative of emaciation and/or starvation/malnutrition. Long bone results on the 6 bovine and 2 equine were reported all less than 10% bone marrow fat content with one equine bone marrow fat content at 13.62% which is still indicative of a negative energy balance for a prolonged period of time.

Owner was charged under section 4(1) of The Animal Protection Act, 2018. Owner plead guilty and was fined $1000 and a Restitution Order of $2000

Summary of Prohibition Order

Errol Eashappie is prohibited from owning, having custody, control, or residing on the same premises of no more than 35 head of cattle, and 8 horses, including offspring commencing on the date of this order for a period of five years, pursuant to Section 23(2) of The Animal Protection Act 2018. Pursuant to Section 23(2) of The Animal Protection Act 2018, shall: 1). Errol Eashappie is required to have a licensed veterinarian attend to his premises where livestock are kept and have the veterinarian assess all livestock and their environment. He is to follow all veterinary requirements regarding the livestock and their environment. This is to be completed annually and no later than one year apart. Veterinary report is to be provided to Animal Protection Services of Saskatchewan. The cost(s) of the veterinary assessment and report are to be the responsibility of Errol Eashappie. 2). Errol Eashappie will have thirty days from the time of this order to disperse of any livestock he owns, has custody or control of as per the court order. 3). To ensure compliance with this order, Errol Eashappie shall permit and facilitate access to his premises between the hours of 7 a.m. and 7 p.m., without warrant up to once per month, by officers of Animal Protection Services of Saskatchewan or any peace officer as defined in the Criminal Code. 4). Errol Eashappie shall at all times keep Animal Protection Services of Saskatchewan apprised of his address of residency and of any land owned or leased including proper land location where livestock may be kept. He is to advise Animal Protection Services of Saskatchewan of any address changes within fifteen days of such change. Should Errol Eashappie be found in possession of animals contrary to this order, the animal(s) will be forfeited and removed from his possession forthwith and will be forfeited to Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Saskatchewan.

Conviction

Prohibition Period

December 7, 2021 - December 7, 2026

Case Summary

Animal Protection Officers responded to a concern for a dog in poor condition not receiving adequate food.  APOs observed two dogs, one of which was in very poor body condition. Both dogs had access to dirty water. There was not adequate shelter for the dogs and they were taken into protective custody when the owner failed to make contact after multiple written notices were posted to improve conditions.

Owner was charged under section 4(2) of the Animal Protection Act, 2018. Owner was found guilty and fined $200 and a Restitution Order of $2163.87 for care of the dogs to be paid on or before November 16, 2021.

Summary of Prohibition Order

No prohibition order

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

Case Summary

Animal Protection Officers attended a rural location where 6 bulls were in thin body condition and 2 deceased bulls in emaciated condition were found. No shelter, no access to liquid water, and no access to hay or supplemental feed. Winter pasture was inaccessible due to frozen, snow packed conditions.

110 cows on the home property were in adequate condition and access to some feed. A Corrective Action Order was issued to supplement feed for all animals, provide shelter, and appropriate care for all animals according to their respective code of practice.

Owner was charged under section 4 of the Animal Protection Act, 2018. Owner plead guilty and was fined $1500

Summary of Prohibition Order

Owner is PROHIBITED FROM OWNING OR HAVING CUSTODY OR CONTROL OF BOVINES. HE SHALL HAVE 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER TO DISPERSE THE BOVINES HE OWNS OR HAS CUSTODY OR CONTROL OF AND MUST PROVIDE BILLS OF SALE OR PROOF OF DISPERSAL TO ANIMAL PROTECTION SERVICES WITHIN 10 DAYS OF DISPOSITION. 2). FOR THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE ORDER, THE RESPONDANT SHALL PERMIT AND FACILITATE ACCESS TO HIS PREMISES OR ANY LAND WHICH HE HAS AN INTEREST IN, DURING DAYLIGHT HOURS BY OFFICERS OF ANIMAL PROTECTION SERVICES, THEIR DESIGNATES OR ANY PEACE OFFICER WITHOUT WARRANT TO CONDUCT WARRANTLESS SEARCHES. ISSUED AT THE CITY OF SWIFT CURRENT IN THE PROVINCE OF SASKATCHEWAN, THIS 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER, A.D. 2021

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

October 27, 2021 - October 27, 2022

Case Summary

Lame cattle not being provided adequate veterinary care or medical attention. Cattle kept in conditions that would significantly impair the animal’s health or well-being.  Cattle being kept in conditions that contravene the code of practice.

Owner was charged  under Section 4 and 23(1a) for failure to comply with a CAO under The Animal Protection Act, 2018 (APA) as well s Criminal Code section 445.1(a) and 446.1(b).

Found guilty and section 4 and 23(1a) of the APA.  Fined $500 and $200 victim surcharge on all counts Total fine $2100

No new prohibition order made as 10 year prohibition is still in place while appeals are heard.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Previous conviction and sentence under the Criminal charge was upheld.  10 year prohibition from owning, having custody or control, or possessing any cattle, nor reside in or occupy the same premises of cattle. Citation: 2021 SKQB 212 **

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

October 3, 2018 - October 3, 2028

Case Summary

Between January 17th, 2019 and February 14th, 2019 Animal Protection Officers attended to locations where Warren RUSSELL had cattle and horses. Recommendations were made and a Corrective Action Order was issued to improve conditions. Cattle were found in distress without access to sufficient food, water, and shelter and were found in poor condition.

A total of 319 cattle were taken into protective custody and provided care. RUSSELL was charged under section 445.1(1)(a) and 446(1)(b) of the Criminal Code and section 4 of the Animal Protection Act, 2018.

RUSSELL plead guilty to the Animal Protection Act charge and was fined $2000. The Criminal Code charges were withdraw. In the decision the Judge did not impose a prohibition after defence counsel indicated S/N had not had cattle for the past 3 years and felt that enforcement in this instance of the legislation should be enough deterrent.

Summary of Prohibition Order

None imposed

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

Case Summary

Animal Protection Officers attended a rural property and found 23 horses in a thin body condition with no supplemental feed or access to liquid water. DELEURME  had a previous Court Order from August 28, 2015 limiting him to ownership of 10 horses. 1 grey/white horse was seen in thin body condition and with the backbone evident. This horse had an approximate 2″-3″ hole to the right side upper rib cage area. The wound appeared deep, 2 ribs were visually evident through the wound.  Owner provided requirements necessary under a Corrective Action Order.

Owner was charged under section 4(2) of the Animal Protection Act and received a fine of $1000.

Summary of Prohibition Order

None ordered.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

Case Summary

Animal Protection Officers along with a veterinary attended to a rural location and found 107 cattle in poor conditions. Sufficient feed and care was not being provided to maintain the animals in a state of good health. 51 deceased cattle were found on the property. Pathology from testing bone marrow showed serous atrophy.  This finding is consistent with emaciation due to a prolonged negative energy balance. Chronic disease, decreased appetite or lack of available feed are some of the causes contributing to these conditions.

BLACK was fined $21,000

Summary of Prohibition Order

BLACK received a lifetime prohibition from owning, possessing, having custody or 3rd party ownership of cattle. 60 days to disperse of any cattle. Must provide address and allow for inspections without a warrant.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

Case Summary

Animal Protection Officer (APO) attended a location to a dog suffering from an injured front leg.  The dog had not received adequate veterinary care for an injury to it’s leg. Owner’s surrendered the dog and it was taken to a veterinarian for care. Dog required a leg amputation as a result of the untreated injury.

Both individuals were fined $500.

Summary of Prohibition Order

JANVIER is prohibited from having custody or control of any animal for a period of 10 yrs starting on Sept. 16th, 2020. Shall allow inspections by an APO without warrant to ensure compliance with the order. Had until Oct. 16th, 2020 to ensure all animals on his property are removed.

HIEBERT is prohibited from owning or having care, custody or control of any animal for a period of 10 yrs from the date of the order with the exception of 3 dogs – Rexy, Barkins and Nita. These dogs are owned by her adult children that reside with her. Shall allow inspections by an APO without warrant between the hrs of 7am – 7pm to ensure compliance with the Order. If the offender is found to be in possession of an animal contrary to the Order, with the exception of the specified 3 dogs the animal will be removed from her possession forthwith and forfeited to her Majesty the Queen in Right of Saskatchewan.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

September 16, 2020 - September 16, 2030

Case Summary

On April 16, 2019 Animal Protection Services executed a search warrant on a rural property near Lanigan owned by Randall WILLEMS.  There was not adequate feed on the property for the number of cattle on property.  34 cattle and 1 horse were found to be in a poor body condition and 25 deceased cattle were found. Most of these deceased cattle were found by the veterinarian to also be in a poor body condition. The pathology samples taken from the deceased cattle indicated that there was serous atrophy of bone marrow fat. The bone marrow fat contents indicated in these samples that these animals were in a negative energy balance for an extended period of time and likely died of starvation or organ failure as a result of starvation.

WILLEMS was charged under section  4(2) of The Animal Protection Act and under section 445.1(1)(a) 446(1)(b) of the Criminal Code of Canada.

WILLEMS was found guilty under section 4(2) of the Animal Protection Act. The Crown withdrew the Criminal Code charges.

WILLEMS was sentenced to a $3000 fine and no order of prohibition was ordered by the court.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Crown had sought a lifetime prohibition from owning livestock. No prohibition was ordered by the court.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

Case Summary

On January 9, 2019, Animal Protection Officers (APOs) executed a search warrant of a 400 square foot house in Elrose, Saskatchewan, that resulted in the seizure of I 06 cats, two dogs and one turtle. Approximately 20 more cats were left behind because they were too fractious for the officers to catch. Ms. LaPlante was originally charged with animal cruelty and neglect under the Criminal Code but those charges were stayed during the trial. The Judge in her written decision stated, “While there may be borderline cases of what constitutes unsanitary conditions for animals, this is not one of them. The size of Ms. LaPlante’s house was grossly insufficient to support the number of cats and resulted in markedly unsanitary conditions and poor air quality. I accept the veterinarian’ s evidence and opinion that the environmental conditions in the house contravened existing standards of animal husbandry and that over time the ammonia levels in the house would affect the animals’ health. The Crown has established beyond a reasonable doubt that the animals were in distress.”

Laplante was sentenced to a fine in the amount of $340.00 and a surcharge of $60.00 to be paid by October 28, 2022.

Summary of Prohibition Order

LAPLANTE is prohibited from owning or having in her custody or control more that 2 dogs and 3 cats at any given time, for life, pursuant to section 23(4) of the Animal Protection Act. She must give the Animal Protection Agency her current address of residence and advise them of any change of address, and allow for inspections by an Animal Protection Officer without warrant. However, that would be on 48 hours notice.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

October 28, 2021 -

-

Case Summary

There were ongoing concerns regarding the lack of care and management of sheep, horses, and fowl belonging to the Alsayeds. Between August 22, 2017 and July 16, 2018 the Alsayeds were provided with education and veterinary requirements to improve the living conditions and care of their animals. When they failed to relieve the animals of their distress 141 chickens, 28 ducks, 2 miniature horses, 24 sheep and 7 lambs were taken into protective custody.  The Alsayeds were charged under section 4 of the Animal Protection Act and Section 445.1(1)(a) of the Criminal Code of Canada.

Both were convicted under section 4 of the Animal Protection Act and each received a fine of $500.

Summary of Prohibition Order

They are prohibited from owning, having custody or control of, or residing on the same premises as any horses, chickens, ducks, or any fowl for a period of 10 years except for 20 chickens for sustenance. To ensure compliance they must facilitate access to their premises, residence or property owned or leased by them between the hours of 8:00am and 5:00pm by members of Animal Protection Services of Saskatchewan or an Peace Officer (as defined in the Criminal Code). The said access is not to exceed more than two inspections per month. During the term of the Order should they be found in possession of any horses, chickens, ducks or fowl except for the 20 chickens for their personal use these animals will be immediately forfeited and removed from their possession and will be forfeited to her Majesty the Queen in right of Saskatchewan.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

April 9, 2021 - April 9, 2031

-

Case Summary

133 cattle found in distress after a Corrective Action Order had been issued to improve conditions. Cattle were found without adequate shelter, feed, water, and bedding in severe cold weather. Most of the herd was in a poor to below average body condition. 131 cattle were seized and 16 deceased cattle were found on property. Pathology tests on deceased animals indicated that they had been in a prolonged negative energy balance (emaciation) for a significant period of time.

Pleaded guilty to section 4 of the Animal Protection Act, 2018. Sentenced to a $7200 fine $2800 victim surcharge. On acceptance of the guilty plea Criminal Code charges under section 445.1(1)(a) and 446(1)(b) were withdrawn.

Summary of Prohibition Order

For the first year of the Order is prohibited from having in his possession any cattle, livestock, or bovine. For the proceeding four years is prohibited from having in his possession any cattle, livestock, or bovine unless he is in compliance with conditions. He must notify Animal Protection Services of SK of his current address and any and all land locations which is leased by him. He must permit and facilitate access to his premises, land locations, leased land or other properties where animal(s) may be present during daylight hours by Animal Protection Officers or any peace officer to ensure compliance with the order. Should he be found in ownership, possession or care of animals contrary to the Order, all animals will be forfeited and removed from his ownership, possession or care forthwith and will be forfeited to Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Saskatchewan.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

February 11, 2021 - February 11, 2026

-

Case Summary

Multiple cats found in unsanitary conditions, cats in poor body condition, cats needing medical attention.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Both individuals are prohibited from owning, possessing or having custody or control of any animal for life. They will permit the inspection of both the interior and exterior of their premises or dwelling, at any time, by an Animal Protection Official, or their designate to ensure compliance with the order.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

September 16, 2004 -

-

Case Summary

Over 60 dogs were inside a residence in unsanitary conditions and conditions that would significantly impair the animal’s health and well being. Dogs were not provided with adequate veterinary care. Fined $2000

Summary of Prohibition Order

FISCHER has a 10 year prohibition on owning more than 3 dogs. Required to update APSS on any change of address. Ability to check for compliance without a warrant during daylight hours.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

May 6, 2020 - May 6, 2030

-

Case Summary

Emaciated dog that did not receive adequate veterinary and required euthanasia.  Animals kept in unsanitary conditions and conditions that would significantly impair the animal’s health and well being. Ordered to pay $100 restitution to APSS.

Summary of Prohibition Order

FOSTER is prohibited from owning, having custody or control of or residing in the same premises or any residence as an animal except a budgie bird, currently in the residence in the care of her daughter commencing on the 8th of June 2020 for a period of 2 years. Provide APSS with a current address or any change during the time of the order. Allow for inspections during daylight hours without a warrant, by APO or Peace Officer to ensure compliance.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

June 8, 2020 - June 8, 2022

-

Case Summary

Dogs and horses deprived of sufficient food and water. Horses not provided with adequate shelter and reasonable protection from injurious heat or cold. Animals kept in unsanitary conditions and conditions that would significantly impair the animal’s health and well being. Animals not provided with adequate veterinary care.

Restitution order to the Animal Protection Services in the amount of $1885

Count: (1) fine $2000, fine surcharge $600 (2) fine $1000, fine surcharge $300

Summary of Prohibition Order

Donna Lee Webster-Dinney is prohibited from owning, having the custody or control of or residing in the same premises as an animal for a period of 5 years. Donna Lee Webster-Dinney will have 30 days from the time of this order to disperse the animal she owns or has custody or control of. To ensure compliance with this order Donna Lee Webster-Dinney shall permit and facilitate access to her premises during daylight hours by officers of Animal Protection Services of Saskatchewan or any peace officer (as defined by the Criminal Code of Canada). During the term of this order Donna Lee Webster­Dinney shall at all times keep Animal Protection Services of Saskatchewan apprised of her address of residency. During the term of this order should Donna Lee Webster-Dinney be found in possession or control of any animal(s) contrary to this Order, the animal(s) will be forfeited to Animal Protection Services of Saskatchewan and/or Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Saskatchewan, except one dog named Bentley, used as a service dog. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 447.1(1) of the Criminal Code.

Conviction

CC 445.1(1)(a) 446(1)(b)

Prohibition Period

August 25, 2020 - August 25, 2025

-

Case Summary

Horses deprived of sufficient food and water to maintain them in a state of good health. Horses being kept in conditions that contravene the code of practice. Fined $1000, $400 victim surcharge, must pay $1920 restitution

Summary of Prohibition Order

Prohibited from owning, possessing, having custody or control of any animals for a period of 1 year.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

November 19, 2019 - November 19, 2020

-

Case Summary

Cattle deprived of sufficient food and water to maintain them in a state of good health. Cattle being kept in conditions that contravene the code of practice. Fined $1000

Summary of Prohibition Order

Prohibited from owning, possessing, having custody or control of any animals for a period of 10 years. Shall not reside in or occupy the same premises as cattle whether in his ownership or third party.  Has 60 days from the time of the order to dispense of his cattle and provide proof of sale. Must provide APSS of his current address including land location. Must allow inspections without a warrant to ensure compliance. If found in possession of cattle contrary to the order, they will be forfeited and removed from his possession.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

February 25, 2020 - February 25, 2030

Case Summary

Dog abandoned by its owner that resulted in the dog starving to death. Criminal code charges were stayed. Fined $100 and $40 surcharge.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Prohibited from owning, having custody or control or residing in the same premises as any animal for a period of 10 years. Must allow inspections without a warrant to ensure compliance. Must keep APSS and RCMP apprised of her address. If found in possession of any animals they will be forfeited and removed.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

February 9, 2019 - February 9, 2029

Case Summary

Horse died as a result of insufficient food and care. Each individual fined $2000

Summary of Prohibition Order

Prohibited from owning, possessing, having custody or control of any horse except to lease a horse for their child for a period of 10 years. Provide copy of the lease, not reside nor occupy the same premises as the leased horse. Have 60 days from date of the order to disburse any horses in their care. Must provide current address to law enforcement. If horse found in their care it will be forfeited and removed. Must allow inspections without a warrant to ensure compliance.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

November 13, 2019 - November 13, 2029

Case Summary

Lame cattle not being provided adequate veterinary care or medical attention. Cattle kept in conditions that would significantly impair the animal’s health or well-being.  Cattle being kept in conditions that contravene the code of practice.  Fined $7000

** On appeal the Kienapple principle (Kienapple v R 1975 Supreme Court of Canada) was applied. Conviction under the Animal Protection Act was quashed. Conviction and sentence under the Criminal charge was upheld. Fine of $2000 and 10 year prohibition from owning, having custody or control, or possessing any cattle, nor reside in or occupy the same premises of cattle. Citation: 2021 SKQB 212 **

Summary of Prohibition Order

Prohibited from owning, having custody or control, or possessing any cattle, nor can he reside in or occupy the same premises as cattle. Must provide current address to law enforcement. Must allow inspections without a warrant to ensure compliance. If he is found in possession of cattle, he forfeits that cattle and cattle removed from the premises.

Conviction

CC & APA

Prohibition Period

June 19, 2019 - June 19, 2029

Case Summary

Dogs, cats, and fowl deprived of sufficient food and water. All animals not provided with adequate shelter and reasonable protection from injurious heat or cold. Animals kept in unsanitary conditions and conditions that would significantly impair the animal’s health and well being.  Fined $1000 and $400 surcharge

Summary of Prohibition Order

Prohibited from owning, having custody or control of more than 4 animals at any one time and before replacing any animals currently residing with the owner must ensure they are spayed/neutered for a period of 25 years. Must allow inspections without a warrant to ensure compliance and provide current address to law enforcement.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

May 6, 2019 - May 6, 2044

Case Summary

Dog in extremely poor body condition that was not provided adequate veterinary care or medical attention. Fined $500 and pay restitution of $368.08

Summary of Prohibition Order

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

Case Summary

Dog in extremely poor body condition that was not provided adequate veterinary care or medical attention. Fined $500 and pay restitution of $368.08

Summary of Prohibition Order

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

Case Summary

Insufficient food and water to maintain horses in a state of good health. Inadequate veterinary care for horses when wounded or ill. Horses kept in conditions that contravene the code of practice. Ordered to pay restitution of $1067

Summary of Prohibition Order

Prohibited from owning or having custody or control of any horses for 10 years, ensure all horses are removed within 30 days of the order, allowed to own 3 domestic pets, excluding horses for 10 years. Must allow inspections without a warrant to ensure compliance. Must provide current address to law enforcement and if residence changes inform law enforcement immediately.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

May 30, 2018 - May 30, 2028

Case Summary

Sheep and lambs not provided with sufficient food or water to maintain them in a state of good health. Inadequate shelter provided. Animals kept in unsanitary conditions and contrary to the code of practice for species.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Owner is prohibited from having any animals in his possession for 5 years. He must notify law enforcement of any change in address and allow for inspection of his premises without a warrant to ensure compliance.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

June 28, 2018 - June 28, 2023

Case Summary

Physical abuse of dog causing unnecessary pain and suffering.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Prohibition for 1 year from owning, having custody or control or residing in the same premises of any animal. Must allow inspections without a warrant to ensure compliance. Fined $250

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

April 4, 2018 - April 4, 2019

Case Summary

Dogs and cats being kept in sanitary conditions impairing their health and well-being. Insufficient food, water, and care necessary to maintain the animals in a state of good health. All individuals guilty under the Animal Protection Act. Criminal Code charges were stayed.

Summary of Prohibition Order

All are prohibited from owning or having custody or control of any animal for 1 year. They are to remove all animals that they own, have custody or control of with the direction of an Animal Protection Officer. They are allowed to place the animals with a third party with the approval of an Animal Protection Officer. Must allow inspections without a warrant to ensure compliance. Darwin JOHNSON was also fined $100. Effective date June 13, 2018

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

June 13, 2018 - June 13, 2019

Case Summary

Animals were seized due to their conditions, lack of food and water.  Deceased animals were also seized for necropsy.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Prohibited from owning or having custody or control of animals, amphibians, or reptiles for a period of 2 years.  He is to provide his current address and allow inspections without a warrant to ensure compliance.  Fined $200 and is to pay compensation in the amount of $1450.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

September 14, 2017 - September 14, 2019

Case Summary

Horse was seized as it was in thin, poor condition.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Prohibited from owning or having custody and control of any livestock for a period of one year. Also, to pay restitution in the amount of $952.40 and was fined $1

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

August 10, 2017 - August 10, 2018

-

Case Summary

Parakeet had not received adequate medical care. Turtle seized due to inadequate care

Summary of Prohibition Order

Prohibited from owning, having custody or control of any animals except for the 3 animals currently in his care for a period of 3 years. He is also to provide his current address to APSS and allow inspections without a warrant to ensure compliance. Fined $500 and to pay restitution $599.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

March 28, 2017 - March 28, 2020

Case Summary

Parakeet had not received adequate medical care. Turtle seized due to inadequate care.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Prohibited from owning, having custody or control of any animals with the exception of the animals currently in her care 3 cats, 1 dog, 4 birds for a period of 1 year. Provide her current address to APSS and allow for inspections without a warrant to ensure compliance. Fined $1000.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

September 22, 2016 - September 22, 2017

Case Summary

Dogs not receiving adequate care. 1 cat was surrendered and euthanized due to medical issues.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Prohibited from owning and having the custody or control of more than 5 pets for a period of 5 years. Provide current address and advise APSS of any changes. Inspections without a warrant to ensure compliance.

Theela FLOSTRAND was convicted of breaching her court order and fined $300 and the victim surcharge on April 10, 2018

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

July 12, 2016 - July 12, 2021

Case Summary

Dogs not receiving adequate care. 1 cat was surrendered and euthanized due to medical issues.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Prohibited from owning and having the custody or control of more than 5 pets for a period of 5 years. Provide current address and advise APSS of any changes. Inspections without a warrant to ensure compliance

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

July 12, 2016 - July 12, 2021

Case Summary

Several dogs seized due to medical and environmental concerns, 2 dogs had to be euthanized and one was found deceased.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Prohibited from owning, having in her possession any more then 5 animals – not to own or possess any more than 5 animals, not to have any more than 5 animals in residence or on property, not to allow any other person or children in your custody to bring or keep any animals that exceed the 5 permitted, not assume responsibility for the care and/or feeding any animal at any other residence, notify APSS current address and any changes, allow inspections without a warrant once a month to ensure compliance; pay restitution in the amount of $1300

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

May 18, 2016 - May 18, 2021

Case Summary

Multiple species of animals found in poor condition and being kept in unsanitary and poor conditions contrary to the specific Codes of Practice for the species.

Summary of Prohibition Order

They shall not own, possess, have custody or control of any animals other than 4 cats, 2 dogs, 4 horses and combination of 5 sheep and goats. They can apply to the court to vary the terms anytime after May 1, 2020. They are to provide a current address to APSS and allow inspections without warrant to ensure compliance.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

April 22, 2015 - January 1, 2100

Case Summary

The dog was in poor body condition. Owner attempted to euthanized the dog with a baseball bat.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Found guilty of  Animal Protection Act charge. Criminal Code charges were stayed. Order to pay restitution in the amount of $1479.73

Conviction

Prohibition Period

Case Summary

Dog was seized as it was in emaciated condition with abrasions and open sores that were untreated.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Prohibited from having custody or control of any animal or bird for 2 years except those animals currently in her possession (female Stafford shire Terrier Pit Bull Dog and female Bull Mastiff Dog). She shall provide her address and allow inspections without a warrant to ensure compliance, a maximum of one inspection per month.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

April 10, 2017 - April 10, 2019

Case Summary

Multiple dogs were living in poor and unsanitary conditions.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Not to own or possess more than 2 animals, not to have more than 2 animals in their residence or on their property, not to allow any other person or children in their custody to bring or keep any animal in their residence or on their property, not to assume responsibility for the care and/feeding of any animal which is kept at any other person’s residence, notify APSS of current address or any address change, allow for inspections without a warrant to ensure compliance once a month

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

February 10, 2016 - February 10, 2021

Case Summary

Chickens were being kept inadequate facilities and contrary to the Code of Practice for Chickens, Turkeys and Breeders.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Prohibited from owning no more than 20 chickens for personal use, 2 years inspections without a warrant to ensure compliance a max of 1 per month, fined $1000 and a surcharge of $400

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

- January 1, 2100

Case Summary

Horses were seized as a result of inadequate care and no access to water.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Prohibited from owning livestock for life but can reapply to the court after 3 years. Fined $2000

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

- January 1, 2100

Case Summary

Dog seized due to inadequate medical care.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Owner must pay restitution in the amount of $500, provide current address and allow inspections to ensure the animals heath for a period of 6 months

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

January 9, 2017 - July 9, 2017

Case Summary

Dogs were seized. They were in emaciated conditions with no access to water or adequate shelter.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Received an 18 moth suspension, 50 hours community service and prohibed from owning animals for a period of 5 years

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

November 11, 2016 - November 11, 2021

Case Summary

Dogs seized due to lack of adequate food, water, shelter and veterinary care.

Summary of Prohibition Order

prohibited for 1 year on owning animals, fined $500

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

January 12, 2016 - January 12, 2017

Case Summary

Cats seized due to lack of medical care, inadequate shelter and care.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Prohibition from owning animals for 5 years, fined $500

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

November 2, 2015 - November 2, 2020

Case Summary

Dog seized due to lack of medical care. Remaining dogs also found not receiving adequate care.

Summary of Prohibition Order

He is prohibited from owning, having custody or control of or residing in the same premises as a dog for a period of 5 years. He is to allow inspections without a warrant to ensure compliance.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

December 19, 2013 - December 19, 2018

Case Summary

Cats seized due to lack of medical care, inadequate shelter, food and water.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Prohibition on owning animals except for one dog, one black cat and one calico cat that has been spayed and tattooed for life. Fined $500

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

- January 1, 2100

Case Summary

Multiple horses found in inadequate conditions, not enough quality and quantity of feed provided.

Summary of Prohibition Order

He is limited to 6 horses starting on January 1, 2016 for a period of 5 years, the horses will constitute a herd incapable of reproducing. He shall maintain his address and supply any change in address to APSS, allow and facilitate inspection of horses at any reasonable house with or without notice to ensure well-being of horses, any breach of veterinarian supervised standard of care of the horses will result in the immediate forfeiture of the horses or horses in question

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

January 1, 2016 - January 1, 2026

Case Summary

Multiple dead horses found on property. Horses seized due to lack of adequate food, water and care.

Summary of Prohibition Order

He shall not own, posses, have custody or control of more than two horses for his respected lifetime. He shall provide his current address and agrees to notify APSS of any changes of address. Allow fir inspections without warrant to ensure compliance. Will pay restitution of $2000.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

April 6, 2017 - January 1, 2100

Case Summary

Large number of dead cattle found on property. Seized cattle that were in poor conditions.

Summary of Prohibition Order

They pled guilty to APA and were fined $1000 each

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

Case Summary

Summary of Prohibition Order

Fined $400, life time limitation of having no more than 2 dogs or cats in total in her care (can apply to have restriction changed after one year); inspections without a warrant upon being provided 3 days notice in writing (order for inspections expires after one year)

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

- January 1, 2100

Case Summary

Dead cattle. Cattle seized due to lack of adequate food, water, shelter, care and medical care.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Lifetime prohibition except he is allowed to have not more than 20 head of cattle between May 1 to Nov 30 of any given year, fined $714.29 and surcharged $285.71

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

- January 1, 2100

Case Summary

Dead horses.  Horses seized due to lack of adequate food, water and care

Summary of Prohibition Order

He shall not own, possess, have custody or control of more than two horses for his respected lifetime.  Allow inspections without a warrant to ensure compliance.  Provide his current address and notify APSS of any changes to his address.  To pay restitution in the amount of $2000

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

-

Case Summary

Horse had severely overgrown hooves and was seized

Summary of Prohibition Order

Fined $1000 and $300 surcharge. Prohibited from owning or having custody or control over any newly acquired animals except existing livestock and their offspring for a period of 2 years, inspections without a warrant to ensure compliance

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

November 10, 2015 - November 10, 2017

Case Summary

Dog was emaciated from a severe, untreated oral tumor. The dog was seized and humanely euthanized.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Pled guilty. Received a $60 fine and $40 surcharge.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

Case Summary

Nearly 900 sheep were seized, many in poor condition, some had to be euthanized. Large number dead sheep found on the property. Considerable issues with lack of appropriate feed, supervision of lambing, lack of veterinary care.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Fined $500, prohibited from owning animals for a period of one year with the exception of 2 pets

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

August 20, 2015 - August 20, 2016

Case Summary

Dog had severe untreated sores, coat was matted. Owner had surrendered the dog, but was charged due to lack of appropriate medical care for the dog.

Summary of Prohibition Order

She was fined $300 and received an 18 month probation.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

Case Summary

Dog seized due to lack of adequate winter shelter.

Summary of Prohibition Order

He received a $500 fine and a surcharge of $80

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

-

Case Summary

Cattle found dead, and euthanized on site. 106 head of cattle seized due to lack of adequate food, water, and care

Summary of Prohibition Order

Prohibited from owning or having custody or control of any livestock for life; allow inspections without a warrant to ensure compliance; Allan was fined $8,000 and surcharge $200 and Joyce was fined $2,000 and surcharged $200

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

- January 1, 2100

Case Summary

Cattle found dead, and euthanized on site. Cattle seized due to lack of adequate food, water, shelter and care.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Prohibited from purchasing any new livestock, he shall be allowed to retain any livestock remaining on his land and their offspring so long as they can be supported without any distress. Allowed to keep a maximum of 3 dogs, and must allow inspections without a warrant to ensure compliance. He is to pay a fine of $100

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

- January 1, 2100

Case Summary

8 dogs were seized as they were in poor body condition, and not receiving adequate care. There were concerns for equines in distress as well.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Prohibited from owing or possessing a domestic or domesticated animal or animal including vertebrates and non-vertebrates during the prohibition order (10 years), not to have them in the residence or on the property, not to allow any other person or children in your custody to bring or keep them, not to assume responsibility for the care and feeding of any of these animals.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

December 6, 2012 - December 6, 2022

Case Summary

Horses seized due poor body condition from lack of appropriate feed, also concerns with shelter, water and general care

Summary of Prohibition Order

Prohibited from owning animals for a period of 10 years, fined $5000, to pay restitution of $912.03 and victim services $750

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

May 6, 2013 - May 6, 2023

Case Summary

Over 80 dogs seized due to lack of adequate food, water, shelter and care

Summary of Prohibition Order

Prohibited from having custody or control of any more than 2 dogs or 2 any other animal for the period of 10 years. She shall provide her current address and allow inspections without a warrant to ensure compliance. Fined $5000

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

June 27, 2013 - June 27, 2023

Case Summary

Cattle found dead, and some euthanized on site. Cattle were not receiving adequate food or care, but were sold before a seizure was required.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Prohibited from owning or possessing any having livestock for a period of 10 years, to allow inspections without a warrant to ensure compliance, fined $500 and surcharged $75

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

January 7, 2013 - January 7, 2023

Case Summary

Thin horses running at large, impounded by the RM after the owner did not retrieve them. The horses were not receiving adequate food, water, shelter or care

Summary of Prohibition Order

Prohibited from owning or having custody or control of any horses for a period of 5 years. He is to provide his current address and allow inspections without a warrant to ensure compliance

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

December 10, 2013 - December 10, 2018

Case Summary

2 horses seized that were in poor condition, 4 other horses were found dead of starvation

Summary of Prohibition Order

He is prohibited from owning or having custody or control of any horses for life, must allow inspections without a warrant to ensure compliance, and is to provide a current address and advise of any address changes

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

June 26, 2014 - January 1, 2100

Case Summary

A dog was seized as  it was in distress due to untreated medical issues.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Received a $400 fine

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

Case Summary

Numerous horses were in poor condition due to inadequate feed, and several died of apparent starvation.  4 horses were seized that were in critical distress and not receiving appropriate feed and water for their condition.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Cannot own more than 20 horses for the next 5 years, ordered to pay $1950 in penalties and surcharges and to allow inspections without a warrant

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

November 17, 2014 - November 17, 2019

Case Summary

At least 5 dead cattle, of apparent starvation, and remaining cattle in poor condition, not receiving adequate food, water, shelter, and medical care.

Summary of Prohibition Order

$1000 fine, and prohibited from being the primary caregiver for any hoofed livestock for a period of 5 years

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

March 18, 2015 - March 18, 2020

Case Summary

Dead horse and dead elk.  Horses were seized due to inadequate feed, water and care.  Remaining elk euthanized by owner.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Prohibited from having custody or control of animals for a period of 2 years.  Fined $1300 and to pay restitution in the amount of $1368.81

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

July 6, 2017 - July 6, 2019

Case Summary

Several horses were seized due to lack of care and two were euthanized to relieve them of their distress.

Summary of Prohibition Order

Prohibited from having in her possession any animal for a period of 5 yrs.  She shall not own or possess any animal; not to assume responsibility for care and/or feeding of any animal which is kept at any other person’s residence.  She is also to pay $420 fine and $80 surcharge.

Conviction

APA

Prohibition Period

April 13, 2017 - April 13, 2022

Case Summary

Chickens were not receiving adequate food, water, shelter and care.  Horse seized due to lack of medical care.

2 March 2020 – Fined $300 and $90 surcharge for breaching the court order

Summary of Prohibition Order

For a period of 25 years, he shall not own, possess, have custody or control of any horses, chickens or other fowl. He has 60 days to dispose of any horses, chickens or others that he owns or cares for. Pursuant to the crimal code, he shall not reside in or occupy the same premises as horses, chicken or other fowl or any property where any third party has ownership, possession or custody or control of any animals which he is prohibited from owning, possession or having the custody. Pursuant to the APA, he shall provide current address, including proper land location by July 15/17 and is advised any changes to APSS with in 15 days. He is to allow inspection without warrant to ensure compliance. Any time after July 1, 2022, he may apply to the Provincial Court to vary the terms proving the Crown 30 days notice

Conviction

APA, Criminal Code

Prohibition Period

June 21, 2017 - June 21, 2042